News

On July 14, 2025, Fresenius Kabi filed IPR2025-01268 against Regeneron’s U.S. Patent No. 11,084,865 (“the ’865 patent”) and IPR2025-01269 against U.S. Patent No. 10,828,345 (“the ’345 patent”), both relating to EYLEA® (aflibercept).  The ’865 patent claims ophthalmic formulations of a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the ’345 patent claims methods of treating an angiogenic eye disorder using a VEGF antagonist.

Previously, the ’865 patent has been challenged in three IPRs by Samsung Bioepis (IPR2025-00176), Formycon (IPR2025-00233) and Celltrion (IPR2025-00456), all of which were denied in June 2025 by the Acting PTO Director for discretionary reasons, particularly ongoing BPCIA litigations between the parties (previously reported Samsung Bioepis and Formycon’s EYLEA® IPRs Discretionarily Denied Institution Among Wave of Fintiv Denials; Regeneron Files Second BPCIA Lawsuit Against Amgen’s Pavblu™; Acting PTO Director Discretionarily Denies Celltrion’s IPR Against EYLEA® Patent).  This patent was also the subject of numerous BPCIA litigations, including Regeneron v. Mylan, Case No. 1:22-cv-00061 (N.D.W. Va.) / MDL 1:24-md-03103 (N.D.W. Va.) where the district court found claims 4, 7, 9, 11, 14-17 valid (appeal dismissed due to settlement).  The ’345 patent has not been subject to a previous IPR.

In the IPR2025-01268 Petition, Fresenius challenges claims 1-5, 7-30, 32-50 of the ’865 patent as anticipated by the Dix reference, an issue which was resolved for many of these claims in favor of Regeneron in the district court Mylan case.  However, Fresenius notes that the Federal Circuit called this decision into question during oral argument, but it was never decided on appeal because the parties settled.  The Dix reference was not raised in the other ’865 patent IPRs that were discretionarily denied.

Fresenius is developing an EYLEA® biosimilar, SKD411, with Sam Chun Dang but has not yet publicly announced an aBLA filing with the FDA.  Unlike the Petitioners filing the IPRs that were discretionarily denied, Fresenius does not have a pending litigation related to its EYLEA® biosimilar.

Regeneron reported EYLEA® U.S. sales of $4.767 billion in FY2024.

For more information about these and other biosimilar patent disputes, please visit BiologicsHQ.

 

_____________________________________________________

The author would like to thank April Breyer Menon for her contributions to this article.


    Methodology

    Information contained in the Venable BiologicsHQ database relates to FDA-approved drug products listed in the CDER Purple Book or on the FDA website (www.fda.gov). Information relating to FDA licensed products, FDA-approved indications, and aBLA and 505(b)(2) applications is obtained from public sources including the U.S. FDA website (www.fda.gov). Information relating to litigations is given only for cases active from January 31, 2010 onward. Information relating to foreign biosimilar / biologics follow-on products approved in Australia, Canada, the E.U., Japan and South Korea is from public sources. Statistics graphics are compiled from information contained in the Venable BiologicsHQ database.

    Disclaimer

    The individuals who maintain this site work for Venable LLP. The information, comments and links posted on this site do not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship has been or will be formed by any communication(s) to, from or with the site and/or the author. For legal advice, contact an attorney at Venable LLP or an attorney actively practicing in your jurisdiction. Do not send any confidential or privileged information to the author; neither Venable LLP nor the author will assume any liability or responsibility for it. If you send any information, documents or materials to the site, you give permission for the author to include them on or in the site. No information, documents or materials you send to the site will be considered confidential or privileged by Venable LLP or its lawyers. Also, no such information, documents or materials will be returned to you. All decisions relating to the content belong to the author.

    Subscribe for Future Updates

      captcha