News

Beginning in November 2024, Merck Sharp & Dohme, LLC (“Merck”) requested post-grant review (“PGR”) of 14 patents owned by Halozyme, Inc. (“Halozyme”), with claims directed to modified PH20 hyaluronidase polypeptides, including modified polypeptides that exhibit increased stability and/or increased activity.

On October 10, 2025, the PTAB instituted PGR2025-00046 against Halozyme’s U.S. Patent No. 12,091,692 (“the ’692 patent”). The PGR alleged that the challenged claims of the ’692 patent are invalid as being obvious, lacking written description, and failing to comply with the enablement requirement. Prior to the institution decision, Halozyme disclaimed multiple claims of the patent, including claims 3-4, 6, and 27-28.

On October 16, 2025, the PTAB instituted PGR2025-00052 against Halozyme’s U.S. Patent No. 12,264,345 (“the ’345 patent”); PGR2025-00024 against Halozyme’s U.S. Patent No. 12,060,590 (“the ’590 patent”); and PGR2025-00030 against Halozyme’s U.S. Patent No. 12,054,758 (“the ’758 patent”). The PGRs alleged that the challenged claims of the ’345, ’590 and ’758 patent are invalid as being obvious, lacking written description, and failing to comply with the enablement requirement.  Prior to the institution decisions, Halozyme disclaimed multiple claims of some of the patents, including claims 3-5, 16, and 31-35 of the ’590 patent and claims 3-5 and 31-40 of the ’758 patent.

These PGRs institution decisions follow on three earlier PGR institution decisions on related Halozyme patents (previously reported PTAB Grants Institution of Three PGRs related to Merck’s Keytruda Qlex™).

There is one co-pending New Jersey litigation between Merck and Halozyme, Case No. 2:25-cv-03179 (D.N.J.).

Keytruda Qlex™ (pembrolizumab; berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph) was approved in September 2025, and sales data is not yet available.

For more information on this and other biologic patent disputes, please visit BiologicsHQ.com.

 

_____________________________________________________

The authors would like to thank April Breyer Menon for her contributions to this article.


    Methodology

    Information contained in the Venable BiologicsHQ database relates to FDA-approved drug products listed in the CDER Purple Book or on the FDA website (www.fda.gov). Information relating to FDA licensed products, FDA-approved indications, and aBLA and 505(b)(2) applications is obtained from public sources including the U.S. FDA website (www.fda.gov). Information relating to litigations is given only for cases active from January 31, 2010 onward. Information relating to foreign biosimilar / biologics follow-on products approved in Australia, Canada, the E.U., Japan and South Korea is from public sources. Statistics graphics are compiled from information contained in the Venable BiologicsHQ database.

    Disclaimer

    The individuals who maintain this site work for Venable LLP. The information, comments and links posted on this site do not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship has been or will be formed by any communication(s) to, from or with the site and/or the author. For legal advice, contact an attorney at Venable LLP or an attorney actively practicing in your jurisdiction. Do not send any confidential or privileged information to the author; neither Venable LLP nor the author will assume any liability or responsibility for it. If you send any information, documents or materials to the site, you give permission for the author to include them on or in the site. No information, documents or materials you send to the site will be considered confidential or privileged by Venable LLP or its lawyers. Also, no such information, documents or materials will be returned to you. All decisions relating to the content belong to the author.

    Subscribe for Future Updates

      captcha