News

On March 9, 2026, the FDA updated its guidance addressing biosimilar development under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) (“New and Revised Draft Q&As on Biosimilar Development and the BPCI Act (Revision 4)”). These updates follow the FDA’s earlier announcements in October 2025 which removed the requirements of comparative efficacy studies to demonstrate biosimilarity and switching studies to demonstrate interchangeability in many circumstances (previously reported FDA Moves to Accelerate Biosimilar Development and Lower Drug Costs in New Draft Guidance).

Traditionally, biosimilar developers have been expected to conduct at least one clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) study directly comparing the proposed biosimilar to the U.S.-licensed reference product. In addition, where sponsors relied on data generated using a non-U.S.-licensed comparator product, the FDA generally recommended a three-way PK study bridging the proposed biosimilar, the U.S.-licensed reference product, and the foreign comparator.

Under the revised draft guidance, the FDA indicates that such studies may not be necessary in all cases. Where scientifically justified, applicants may be able to rely on clinical data with a non-U.S.-licensed product without conducting a three-way PK study. The FDA also removed the recommendation that every biosimilar application include a PK study directly comparing the proposed product with the U.S.-licensed reference product.

In addition, the FDA finalized its previously issued “New and Revised Draft Q&As on Biosimilar Development and the BPCI Act (Revision 3)” (September 2021), withdrawing and updating Q&As I.8, I.10, and I.19.

The FDA also withdrew the 2015 final version of the scientific considerations guidance “Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product” due to changes in FDA’s current thinking.

For more information about biosimilars and biosimilar patent disputes, please visit BiologicsHQ.

 

_____________________________________________________

The authors would like to thank April Breyer Menon for her contributions to this article.


    Methodology

    Information contained in the Venable BiologicsHQ database relates to FDA-approved drug products listed in the CDER Purple Book or on the FDA website (www.fda.gov). Information relating to FDA licensed products, FDA-approved indications, and aBLA and 505(b)(2) applications is obtained from public sources including the U.S. FDA website (www.fda.gov). Information relating to litigations is given only for cases active from January 31, 2010 onward. Information relating to foreign biosimilar / biologics follow-on products approved in Australia, Canada, the E.U., Japan and South Korea is from public sources. Statistics graphics are compiled from information contained in the Venable BiologicsHQ database.

    Disclaimer

    The individuals who maintain this site work for Venable LLP. The information, comments and links posted on this site do not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship has been or will be formed by any communication(s) to, from or with the site and/or the author. For legal advice, contact an attorney at Venable LLP or an attorney actively practicing in your jurisdiction. Do not send any confidential or privileged information to the author; neither Venable LLP nor the author will assume any liability or responsibility for it. If you send any information, documents or materials to the site, you give permission for the author to include them on or in the site. No information, documents or materials you send to the site will be considered confidential or privileged by Venable LLP or its lawyers. Also, no such information, documents or materials will be returned to you. All decisions relating to the content belong to the author.

    Subscribe for Future Updates

      captcha